Category — Money Issues

Last week NPR caused a minor uproar among public defenders with its hatchet piece on the state of the profession featuring perhaps the nation’s worst public defender, Bob Slameka.

Now, Woman of the Law gives us the beginning of the real story with her simple statement of what it really means to be a public defender. NPR should do a story on the PD funding crisis featuring WotL and others like her.

Thanks, WotL, for the simple reminder of why we do — and love — this work.

From the MinnPost:

Michael Kunkel’s work was done. For the moment.

The young lawyer with the Joe Mauer sideburns was trying to relax. His hearing before the Minnesota Court of Appeals, including rapid-fire, rugged questioning from the three justices, was over.

But his day was not.

Kunkel, 29, was gathering his belongings for a parole hearing in Anoka County 25 miles. He has another 30 or so cases on his desk back at the State Public Defender’s Office at the less-than-glamorous Griggs Midway Building on University Avenue in St. Paul.

Just so happens Kunkel’s venue today was Courtroom 200 of the Minnesota Judicial Center.

It’s directly beneath Courtroom 300, the daily venue for the Norm Coleman-Al Franken recount trial.

…

Coleman’s and Franken’s lawyers are making — what? — an average of $500 an hour? They’re big hitters from Washington, Seattle and the Twin Cities. Sounds like as much as $20,000 a week per lawyer, give or take a grand or two.

…

The state public defender’s office, already reeling from 53 layoffs this year, could be in further danger if state budget cuts whack the justice system. Kunkel, who has been with the PD’s office for three-and-a-half years, could be laid off.

Meanwhile, three state district court judges, supported by their state-paid clerks, sit in Courtroom 300, and a Ramsey County courts clerk administers proceedings that drag on in the Franken-Coleman case.

Read the entire article

From the Lansing State Journal:

Today, the Campaign for Justice, a coalition of Michigan legal groups and human rights and faith organizations, launched an effort to reform Michigan’s system to prevent further miscarriages of justice.

The effort builds on a report issued in June that found the state’s system of providing court-appointed attorneys for indigent defendants, now funded through counties, is flawed and failing. The report, offered by the National Legal Aid and Defender Association and the State Bar of Michigan, found that defense attorneys had little time or resources to prepare their cases.

Forty-three states spend more per-capita on indigent defense than Michigan.

Based on this report, the coalition issued a “report card” today for Michigan’s defense system that offered Ds and Fs in nearly every category.

Read the entire story

From the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer:

Georgia’s cash-strapped public defender system, which already struggles to pay a growing backlog of legal fees, could be faced with a new round of bills stemming from a case under review by the state’s top court.

The arguments before the Georgia Supreme Court on Monday focused on who should pick up the tab for a Burke County death penalty case. But the public defender system solemnly warned that the court’s ruling could lead to more fees that could end in “financial jeopardy.”

“This case could have a much broader impact,” said Mack Crawford, the system’s director, after the arguments.

It’s the latest challenge facing the beleaguered public defender network, which has been a target of frustrated legislators almost since it took effect in 2005.

The gaudy defense bills for the trial of courthouse gunman Brian Nichols – which may have topped $2 million – became a rallying cry for deep cuts even before the state grappled with a $2.2 billion deficit.

Now the department, like other state agencies, is bracing for a new round of cuts as it seeks to shed about 10 percent of its budget. And the outcome of this case could determine whether the system is on the hook for a slew of bills it hasn’t budgeted.

The case stems from the trials of Willie Palmer, who was convicted of murder in the 1995 deaths of his estranged wife and 15-year-old stepdaughter. An appeals court ordered a new trial in March 2005, and the council’s former director said the state would pick up the tab.

Palmer was again convicted and sentenced to death in 2007. But his attorneys, Michael Garrett and Randolph Frails, were told the county should pay the costs when they submitted their $68,000 bill to the council.

In court on Monday, council attorney Judson Turner warned the judges it is only authorized to pay for new death penalty cases after it was established in 2005, not existing or past cases.

Read the entire story

From the Kingman Daily Miner (AZ):

A new plan is in the works to take some of the confusion out of indigent defense at the County Superior Court.

The County Public Defender’s and Legal Defender’s offices will present a plan during Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s meeting that will create an Office of Indigent Legal Services. The Board will meet at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday in the County Administration Building, 700 W. Beale St.

The office, according to material provided to the Board, will reorganize how indigent defense cases are processed.

Currently, if a defendant cannot afford to pay for an attorney, a judge assigns the case to the PDO. If the PDO has a conflict of interest in taking the case or currently does not have an attorney that can take the case, the case is then assigned to the LDO. If the LDO has a conflict of interest or does not have an attorney who can take the case, it is sent back to the PDO, which then assigns it, via a contract, to an outside attorney. Outside attorneys are paid a set hourly wage per case.

If approved, the director of the new Office of Indigent Legal Services would determine which indigent defense cases will go to the LDO or PDO, and which ones will be contracted to outside attorneys. The office will also oversee the use of investigators, experts, interpreters and other services used by attorneys in order to keep costs down.

Read the entire article

From The Gainsville Times:

Faced with a growing indigent defense bill where costs were once much lower, Hall County State Court officials want to improve how they provide lawyers for the poor in 2009.

But while “improvement of delivery of indigent defense services” is a stated goal for state court this year, it’s likely to be more of a fine tuning than a wholesale revision of the system.

Hall County’s Public Defender Office was created in 2005 to represent poor defendants in felony cases prosecuted in superior court, but state court judges still appoint lawyers from a panel of about 30 area criminal defense attorneys who are paid by the hour. In recent years, their workload and billing both have gone up dramatically.

Six years ago, 848 cases in state court had court-appointed attorneys paid by taxpayer money. In the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court decision and a loosening of indigent guidelines, that number increased at a greater rate than the rise in criminal case loads, peaking in fiscal year 2006-07 with nearly 3,000 cases with attorneys appointed for indigent defendants charged with misdemeanors.

In fiscal year 2007-08, Hall County spent $742,000 paying attorneys to represent people in 2,377 misdemeanor criminal cases.

The right of poor criminal defendants to have an attorney provided at taxpayer expense was once largely reserved for felony cases or serious misdemeanor crimes that carried a real threat of jail time.

But in 2002, the Supreme Court’s decision in Alabama v. Shelton reaffirmed the constitutional right to counsel for all criminal defendants facing even a remote possibility of jail time. Now, officials say, defendants facing such minor charges as speeding or failure to yield in a traffic accident are applying for, and getting, court-appointed attorneys who are paid $60 an hour in court and $50 an hour outside of court, with a $1,000 cap.

The average cost for representing an indigent defendant in state court in fiscal year 2007-08 was $312.

One change that has been seriously considered is shifting the duties of state court indigent defense to the public defender office, which might get the job done cheaper and more efficiently. But that would require hiring more lawyers and providing more office space.

In the current economic climate, Forrester said, “I don’t think we could recommend to anyone creating another level of bureaucracy to support government.”

Proponents of the current appointed attorney system note that state court provides a good training ground for young members of the criminal defense bar that would not exist if the public defender’s office moved in.

Said Wynne, “While we certainly try to improve upon the system we have, there are a lot of good things about it. We have a lot of good attorneys interested in doing defense work who do a good job. Yes, there are costs associated. They are subject to going up with the case numbers and with the revenue going up.”

Read the entire story

From the Post-Bulletin (MN):

A 10 percent cut budget cut would result in the elimination of 300 to 400 positions statewide.

The justice system includes prosecutors, public defenders, law enforcement and people who provide legal services to the poor.

John Stuart, chief public defender in Minnesota, said his department cut 53 public defender positions last year because of budget woes. Another 100 public defenders would be lost under a 10 percent budget cut, he said. These are the attorneys who represent people unable to hire lawyers.

“I love living in a country where people have rights. Everyone has the right to a fair trial, but that does not happen automatically,” he said. “People have to be there to do the work, to provide the service.”

In Rochester, he said, there are public defenders with 200 active cases. Stuart said there will be delays.

“No one gets a fair trial if he has to wait one or two years for his trial,” Stuart said.

If cases are delayed, security is jeopardized, Stuart said. Jails will become more overcrowded because defendants will be held longer waiting for trials and hearings, increasing the cost to counties.

Olmsted County Sheriff Steve Von Wald said crime usually goes up in times of economic crisis.

Magnuson said courts collect $200 million in revenue annually for state and local governments. Much of that would be gone.

He said the state’s justice system is stretched to the breaking point and further cuts would jeopardize the system. And that, he said, will affect just about every Minnesotan.

Read entire story

San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi told his city’s leadership that if they don’t cough up $50k/year for two part-time paralegals he will ethically obligated to send homicides and major felonies out of the office at a cost of $120/hr. That would add more than $1 million to the City’s annual costs for indigent defense.

“We are the only department that is constitutionally mandated,” he said Wednesday. “The public defender’s office has a responsibility, and we are obligated to decline representation if we are not properly staffed.”

Hmm. $50k/year or more than $1 million? Not really a tough choice, eh, S.F.? Of course, the city says it’s more complicated than that….

UPDATE: It looks like the S.F. Public Defender is now in a pissing match with a city Supervisor.

The Chief Justice of the Missouri Supreme Court  is warning her state’s legislature that if they don’t pony up some cash, they may be facing lawsuits because of the poor quality of indigent defense in that state:

“One measure of a society’s justice system is how well it handles the worst of citizens who come before it,” Stith said during her address at the Capitol. “Well, I hope there are other measures too, because of all states with statewide public defender systems, Missouri ranks dead last in per capita funding of public defenders.”

The problem, according to Stith, affects both the defendants in criminal cases and the victims. Defendants might be denied their constitutional guarantees to quick public trials and adequate defense. Victims sometimes must watch in frustration as evidence or witnesses disappear and stress increases. She warned that, if not corrected, defendants potentially could be set free without going to trial.

“Missouri does not want to find itself in the position of other states, such as Indiana, Montana and Washington, that were faced with the possibility of releasing prisoners or lawsuits from the ACLU if they did not fix their public defender crises,” stated Stith.

Marketplace, a program of American Public Media (the second largest producer of public radio programming in the country, presumably behind NPR, and producer of A Prairie Home Companion) wants to hear from legal professionals about how the economy is impacting them. From the e-mail I received earlier today:

How is the financial crisis affecting the legal profession?

Corporate law firms have proven adept at navigating financial downturns in the past, but this time things appear to be different. Two venerable San Francisco law firms have collapsed, firms around the country are shedding associates and lateral partners are now available at bargain salaries.

Has the financial crisis changed the way you work?

Big firms aren’t the only ones feeling the pinch. Legal aid services and public defenders around the country are preparing for budget cutbacks – right at a time when their services are needed most.

As part of our ongoing coverage of the financial crisis, Marketplace wants to know how the financial crisis has affected your practice.

Looks like all you have to do is go here and submit some information (as much as you like). Given the growing financial crisis in the country and the impact on legal services, it is important that the fight for money gets some coverage. Whether you respond or not, it is something worth discussing and passing along.

From The Wichita Eagle and Kansas Defenders:

Steve Osburn is chief of the Sedgwick County public defenders — the attorneys who represent people charged with crimes but who can’t afford to hire lawyers.

As head of the Wichita office, Osburn is the second-highest paid public defender in Kansas. But his $77,000 salary would rank Osburn 14th if he worked at the Sedgwick County District Attorneys’ office.

Discrepancies in compensation between public defenders and prosecutors go beyond their paychecks. It also affects access to legal training that could give prosecutors an advantage in the courtroom.

Both offices vigorously defend the talents of their attorneys. They say they do their jobs as much out of dedication as for money.

“Justice shouldn’t be for sale, and I believe most of the people who come to work for our office believe that,” Osburn said.

Still, prosecutors who press felony charges in Wichita make about $20,000 more a year than the court-appointed lawyers across the aisle.

Prosecutors working for District Attorney Nola Foulston make a median salary of $64,000 a year, according to the most recent numbers available. Foulston makes nearly $136,000.

Public defenders, meanwhile, make a median salary of little more than $44,000 a year.

That salary is so low that one Wichita public defender, German-born Klaus Dieter Mueller,nearly had his visa revoked because U.S. immigration officials considered him “underemployed” because of his pay.

There are 22 attorneys in the Sedgwick County Regional Public Defender’s office, handling 4,342 cases this year, according to theBoard of Indigents’ Defense Services.

The caseload has increased each year, from 3,866 three years ago.

That’s about 197 cases for each attorney to handle in a year.

And the salary gap has grown with the caseload.

In 2003, the last time The Eagle examined salaries of public attorneys in Sedgwick County District Court, prosecutors made 28 percent more than public defenders.

Now the difference is 33 percent.

Read the entire story

From WWLTV (NOLA):

Two major players in the New Orleans criminal justice system will make their budget pitches to the City Council on Friday, but only one is expected to get funding.

The District Attorney’s Office has historically received millions from the city’s general fund, but those with the Orleans Public Defenders say they’ve never received a dime.

Incoming Chief Public Defender Derwyn Bunton says an upcoming financial shortfall is only expected to make matters worse.

“Everything is on the table for us, from cuts in services to cuts in staff and salaries,” said Bunton.

The office is funded through the state, court fees and fines, and through a $1.7 million grant from the federal government.  The grant, however, is slated to expire at the end of the year.

Interim Chief Public Defender Chris Flood says the financial hole only adds to the widening gap in resources between his department and the District Attorney’s Office.

“Right now there is one public defender to every three district attorneys,” said Flood.

Flood describes the disparity as a sort of three-legged race for justice where his 32 public defenders, all assigned to help the city’s poor and accused, are figuratively tied at the ankles to the 92 district attorneys paid to argue against them.

We can move the cases through the court system as fast as they can be defended, not as fast as they can be prosecuted,” said Flood.

Flood and Bunton say unless their office can close the funding gap, they will have to begin making cuts as early as January 1, 2009.

“If we have to cut back on services that could mean cases without lawyers and cases without layers don’t move forward,” said Flood.

Read the entire story

Hi. I’m the guy who blogs sporadically over at the imbroglio. Gideon has been busy working and focusing on Connecticut criminal law on his main blog so I volunteered to help out a little here at PD Stuff to keep the PD news and errata flowing. My goal is to increase the posting frequency here and start the rumor that Sanchovilla and Blonde Justice are having an affair which is making Skelly incredibly jealous because he called dibs on Sancho and even got his nails done.

Oh, sorry. What I meant to say is that since the last update here at PD Stuff, public defenders in seven states have begun refusing cases because of high case loads and lack of funds/resources. Scoplaw is right in the thick of it, working in the office that is currently litigating the issue in the FL Supreme Court. Simple Justice points out that the incredibly bad working conditions of public defenders are nothing new:

For as long as I can remember, PDs have been at the edge of a precipice, doing the heavy lifting of representing the poor so that the wheels of the criminal justice system can grind away. They stood there trying to hold back the crush of humanity that threatened to swallow them, and the system. The crush can no longer be held back, unless these offices give up any pretense of providing meaningful representation. No one can represents hundreds of defendants at a time. No lawyer can fulfill their ethical obligation when their caseload that increases at this pace. They are literally drowning under a sea of humanity.

With hatchet jobs in the press about public defenders it’s no wonder so few people seem to understand the realities of the situation. And as if that weren’t bad enough, Skelly points to the Legal Ethics Forum where Andrew Perlman thinks that the situation is only going to get worse. At least in Wisconsin, some PDs are getting recognized as the unsung heroes they are (via Song of the Soul). Gideon had a great suggestion to address the dire situation nationwide: a bailout for public defender systems.

Down in the trenches, Ipse Dixit is dealing with clients who aren’t helping themselves, Injustice Anywhere has been working hard for thankless clients, and Doubtslinger just lost a murder trial. That’s a tough one, but Doubtslinger has the attitude we all must have in these times, the attitude that we must have to keep us going against all odds: “Tomorrow will be a better day.”

It better be, dammit. Hey, at least we got a new president.

From WWLTV.com:

“Prosecuting criminals is an important part of keeping order in the city,” said Ken Foster, anti-crime advocate and co-founder of Silence Is Violence.

But Foster acknowledges that doesn’t tell the whole story.

“The other side of the coin is the Public Defenders Office.”

On the corner of Tulane and Broad, 32 criminal court public defenders work to help the city’s indigent and accused, that’s compared to the 90 district attorneys paid to argue against them.

“There’s a recognition in this city that we want a top flight fully functioning, effective, efficient, and fair criminal justice system, but we’re not going to get that if we only have a public defenders office that’s one third the size of the prosecutor,” said Chris Flood, New Orleans interim chief public defender.

Flood says the disparity between his office’s resources and those provided to the district attorney is bound to get wider, which he warns would dramatically impact the criminal justice system.

“We’re not going to be in a position where we can take anymore cases, and if we can’t take anymore cases, no cases will move forward,” said Flood.

According to Flood, the State of Louisiana doles out about $2,360,000 in funding to the Office of the Orleans Public Defenders, court fees provide approximately $1,170,000 and a federal grant offers $1,720,000. Flood says the federal dollars, however, run out next year and are not renewable.

With the major financial hole looming, Flood fears he could soon have to lay off a third of his lawyers. On Thursday, he pled his case to the New Orleans City Council, which Flood says, historically, has never given the Office of Orleans Public Defenders a dime.

Flood urged the council to make good on his office’s appeal for a 5 million dollar chunk of the 2009 city budget, and his plea found traction.

Read the entire article

And the merry go round continues:

Beginning this week, public defender offices across Missouri will be able to refuse new clients as they try to deal with huge backlogs of cases.

The Missouri Public Defender Commission approved a policy in July that allows local offices to opt out of new cases if they exceed maximum caseload capacity for three consecutive months.

Offices in Springfield, Ava, Jefferson City and Columbia will be the first to begin enforcing the policy Wednesday.

The first types of clients to go unrepresented will likely be people accused of probation violations or those charged with certain collections and traffic crimes. Private attorneys who can take cases for free may take up some of the slack, but it’s not known what effect the shift will do to an already overburdened court system.

“This isn’t going to come close to fixing the problem,” said Cathy Kelly, deputy director of the state public defender system. “We’re trying to move toward fixing capacity without pulling the rug out all at once.”

Greene County Presiding Judge Dan Conklin said he was pleased that the offices planned to phase in the cutoff, which he said was “reasonable,” but acknowledged, “We’re in trouble.”

The state’s 36-year-old system for representing Missouri’s poorest criminal defendants who can’t afford their own counsel has not seen a meaningful increase in staffing or budget since 2000.

Read the entire story